Science and engineering share a lot in common – for example when engineering or building anything you need to think carefully about if it’s strong enough for it’s uses (physics), what materials are useful (chemistry) and what might be a danger to us biologically out of the materials used (biology).
However when we the scientists want something built, we need to tell the engineers what we want – they need to tell us what they can actually make, and they need to have an understanding of a lot of science – like melting points and properties of metals if they are forging something, or chemicals to use that will be safe. Science and Engineering both need each other!
When I started university I was doing two degrees – civil engineering and science, so hopefully I’m well placed to answer your question! I originally took physics at uni because I thought it would help me with the engineering, and it did! Where engineering courses usually just teach you something and get you to apply it, in physics I really felt I understood where it all came from and how it all worked on a deeper level. To me, that meant I was then in a better place to apply it!
After 2 years I realised that I wanted to be the one finding out how things worked, and so went into physics and stopped doing engineering. Strangely, now, I find myself half way between the two – doing some quite fundamental physics but always knowing that I’m designing a machine which actually has to be built one day. I find that my engineering training has helped a lot with things like project management… so it certainly wasn’t a waste of time!
Hope that helps, feel free to ask more questions 🙂
Comments