A crystal of salt is much much larger than the ions it’s made up of – so a grain of salt is neutral on average as the negative and positive ions cancel each other out. So they don’t stick together. Unless you put water in there… I’ve had steam from boiling pots get into my salt shaker and that makes it stick together!! (because it dissolves and re-crystallises I guess!)
The atomic bonds in a crystal of salt aren’t particularly strong – they hold the crystals together, but it’s not a case of putting one crystal next to another and they’d stick together – you’d need to get the bonds almost perfectly aligned to do that, and that wouldn’t be possible. Good question!
Within the crystals, the ions bond because of these forces – but the crystals themselves don’t stick together because a crystal of salt is neutral – it has no charge. The crystals are all different shapes and sizes so they would find it hard to align perfectly and stick together – if they did that would form a bigger crystal – but on the scale of the salt-shaker that is still very small.
My guess (and it’s completely a guess) would be that the Na+ and Cl- ions don’t form a nice straight line at the edge where the whole structure of a single salt crystal stops, and that the structure isn’t as orderly as it would be within the crystal, because at the edges the ions are left without as many other ions surrounding them as they would “like”. In some places the surface must be left with some ions on a higher layer than other edge ions are – after all, when the salt lattice structure is forming, it wouldn’t form a whole smooth “sheet” of ions to build up its structure in the same instant. Hence some ions jutting out from the surface would get in the way of two salt crystals bumping together close enough for this attraction to be strong enough, let alone bumping together in the right orientation, for the molecules to bond in this way. The structure needs to be rearranged for two crystals to become one, for example through dissolving and then recrystallising, or melting the salt then cooling it again. I hope that makes sense – ’twas very fun thinking about it even my answer isn’t correct. It would be much appreciated if (one of) the scientists could give me their view(s) on this, please 🙂 – thank you for the question, freddie!
Probably a more sophisticated and involved answer than mine! If you put a crystal under something like an STM (Scanning tunnelling microscope), you could probably see what the surface of the cryatal looks like – it looks very much like an aerial view of a canyon with plateaus. You’ve probably got lots of edge effects too – this is where spare bonds might have been taken by other atoms (perhaps something like hydrogen or an oxide), so there are lots of imperfections in that.
Really good questions though guys – your questions have been awesome, in fact could you both tell me the names of your schools / colleges? I think you both deserve a small prize!
great questions again guys, well done & Doppler I think you were pretty close to the mark with your answer. I looked this up as I didn’t really know, and I found this discussion: http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?topic=32663.0
I hope it’s useful to you!
(Adam, are you using bribery for votes??)
Comments
freddie commented on :
But why don’t the edges match up positive to negative? I’ve drawn a diagram which might make my question clearer. http://i.imgur.com/3JMYp.jpg
doppler commented on :
My guess (and it’s completely a guess) would be that the Na+ and Cl- ions don’t form a nice straight line at the edge where the whole structure of a single salt crystal stops, and that the structure isn’t as orderly as it would be within the crystal, because at the edges the ions are left without as many other ions surrounding them as they would “like”. In some places the surface must be left with some ions on a higher layer than other edge ions are – after all, when the salt lattice structure is forming, it wouldn’t form a whole smooth “sheet” of ions to build up its structure in the same instant. Hence some ions jutting out from the surface would get in the way of two salt crystals bumping together close enough for this attraction to be strong enough, let alone bumping together in the right orientation, for the molecules to bond in this way. The structure needs to be rearranged for two crystals to become one, for example through dissolving and then recrystallising, or melting the salt then cooling it again. I hope that makes sense – ’twas very fun thinking about it even my answer isn’t correct. It would be much appreciated if (one of) the scientists could give me their view(s) on this, please 🙂 – thank you for the question, freddie!
Adam commented on :
Probably a more sophisticated and involved answer than mine! If you put a crystal under something like an STM (Scanning tunnelling microscope), you could probably see what the surface of the cryatal looks like – it looks very much like an aerial view of a canyon with plateaus. You’ve probably got lots of edge effects too – this is where spare bonds might have been taken by other atoms (perhaps something like hydrogen or an oxide), so there are lots of imperfections in that.
Really good questions though guys – your questions have been awesome, in fact could you both tell me the names of your schools / colleges? I think you both deserve a small prize!
doppler commented on :
Thank you for your response! 🙂 I’m in the lower sixth at Leventhorpe, in Sawbridgeworth.
freddie commented on :
I’m in Upper Sixth at Kingston Grammar School
(I’m a junior member of the Institute of Physics)
freddie commented on :
Here’s a close up image http://www.mos.org/sln/sem/ksalt.html
It appears the small salt crystals are made up of tiny cubes!
Suzie commented on :
great questions again guys, well done & Doppler I think you were pretty close to the mark with your answer. I looked this up as I didn’t really know, and I found this discussion:
http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?topic=32663.0
I hope it’s useful to you!
(Adam, are you using bribery for votes??)
Adam commented on :
I’m using positive reinforcement to win me votes =3
Sheila commented on :
Its not working, both doppler and freddie are voting for Suzie 😀
Suzie commented on :
YAY!
Rob commented on :
Wow! i just answered this and found a whole discussion going on here about it. Good work guys 🙂